Will Asian Soccer Rise?
In the past years, European
soccer has dominated the soccer world while Asian soccer was relegated to the back seat.
European leagues like the English Premier League is widely followed by soccer fanatics the
world over, and competitions like the European Cup attracts not only Europeans but
also Asian fans to its matches. In international competitions like the World Cup, it
is the European national teams who are seeded and are always the favorite in every match.
The Asian teams are written off even before they can prove themselves. This was
obvious in the last World Cup, where everyone, including the Yugoslavian players
themselves thought that Iran would be trashed by Yugoslavia. In the end, what
happened? The Yugoslavians were shell shocked by the way Iran played that they
behaved no less than zombies during the entire match. And during a recent friendly
involving Korea and Brazil, everyone was expecting Korea to lose heavily when they shocked
everyone by beating Korea (South). No one would ever give Asian teams a chance. And if you
were to ask any soccer fan who his favorite player was, he would be 99% likely to give you
a European or Brazilian name. Many young talented Asian players dreamt of going to Europe
to play, but no young European player would even consider coming to Asia to play in any of
its league. The story does not end there. If
you look at the Asian players playing abroad, the majority of them are on the bench. This
can be seen from the complaints on many Iranian soccer message boards. So, will Asia
forever be second to European soccer. I do not believe we will stay this way, and I am
encourage by the performances of the Iranian and Japanese teams during the last World Cup,
and the performances of these two teams and Korea during friendlies. I believe that we can
be as good as European teams, but there are problems that are huge obstacles to us in our
fight to dominate the soccer world. Among them are the lack of chances given to Europe
based Asian players, soccer corruption in Southeast Asia and infighting and back stabbing
in national football associations. Let me give my opinion on the problems.
Let us begin with the lack of chances given. This is not caused by us. But this is one
problem which I feel hinders the development of
talented Asian players playing abroad and prevents them from bringing glory to Asia. Let
me talk about the Iranian players since they are the most familiar to the reader and also
the majority of overseas Asian players. I do wonder why German clubs bother to hire
Iranian players when all they do is to let them sit on the bench. I wonder why some
coaches have no faith in their Iranian imports when they have drafted them into the team.
I also wonder why clubs are so "scared" of hiring Iranian players when they
declare they want to sign on a player and than drop him the next minute. Let me use
Germany as an example.
What are three of Asia's best player doing in Germany. Look, Asia's
best striker is spending 90% of his time on the bench, when I cannot see the true talent
of the Bayern forwards, who do not look more threatening. Asia's most talented player is
playing in Germany's division two, and no club has come forward to take him when players
not as talented as him are playing in division one. Asia's youngest talent has been let
down time and again by clubs who do not seem to be sincere in signing him. And I am
talking about Ali Daei, Karim Bagheri and Mehdi Mahdavikia respectively. Let me voice my
views.
When Bayern Munich signed on Ali Daei, I was wondering, why didn't they sign on Karim
Bagheri as well? If a club like Armenia Belefeld was wise enough to sign on two Iranians
who would have telepathic understanding of each other on the field, surely Bayern can also
do so?
Especially when it is loaded with cash. It would be wise to sign both Bagheri and Daei, as
it will be Bagheri who would be able to supply Daei and the other strikers with his
crosses, especially when Daei and Bagheri have good understanding of each other. To sign
Daei with Bagheri would be an advantage as the link between the strike force and midfield
would be solved. Or at least partly. Bagheri has played very well for Armenia when Daei
was there, and he has proved himself. So why did Bayern sign only a player who is good in
scoring when there is another player who is not only good in midfield skills but also
scoring. Why take one and not two? Poor Bagheri. Asia's most talented player is in
division two. Is Bayern afraid to take the risk of signing two Asian players as it has the
view that Asian player's skills are inferior. The club must not forget what Bagheri did
against Germany in the World Cup.
Mehdi Mahdavikia was first approached by Borrusia Dortmund,
and for many months it seemed sincere in signing Mehdi. But than, Mehdi could not get out
of Iran because of his military service. That is none of Borrusia's fault. But, when he
was finally exempted from military service, where was Dortmund? It did not keep up with
its desire to sign Mehdi. If it was keen and really wanted Mehdi in its ranks, it should
have kept its word and signed him. I hear that he is going to sign for Hamburg. But I
think that will not erase the possible disappointment he has in Borrusia Dortmund.
I must clarify that both Bagheri and Mahdavikia are not my favorite players, and I am not
siding with them. But this is what I feel when I read reports about them on the
message boards. And this does not happen only to them, but to other Iranian players who
play abroad.
Frankly speaking, I am so tired of these reports that I wish
that I could tell the clubs straight that such players must be given a chance to play in
the first team. These players come from a culture so different from Germany, or even
Austria. They must be given time to adapt and prove themselves. But, are they given the
chance? One or two matches are not enough, even if they start in the first eleven. The
players are young, and this is their first venture out of Iran. What can the club expect
from them from just the first match? I feel that the coaches judge the players too fast. I
wish and hope that the coaches will be more open minded and play more Iranians in their
first eleven.
What is the use of just signing them and than leave them on
the bench. I feel that this problem is caused by unfounded fears that the players cannot
perform and prejudice. I hope that mindsets will change. In the mean time, I urge all
Iranian players not to give up and not to let this affect their self-esteem. I believe
they are on par with the locals in the league they are playing.
Another problem which Asian soccer faces is the hard core problem
of soccer corruption which does not seem to eradicate despite so many years of effort by
countries involved. Recently, an anti corruption seminar was held in Singapore in which
awareness was created about this problem, and ways on how to battle it was discussed. This
problem is a Southeast Asian problem, and the seriousness of this problem was only
realized when nearly a hundred players playing in the Malaysia Cup (most of them being
Malaysians) were charged for soccer bribery. This incident happened in 1994, and this led
to Singapore pulling out of the Malaysian Cup (and league) to form its first professional
league in 1996. Singapore had won the Malaysian league and Cup double, but it was found
out that in that same year, many footballers were receiving bribes to either win or lose
matches, and most of them against Singapore. A Singapore footballer, Australian Abbas
Saad, was also charged with bribery. This controversy caused the football associations of
Malaysia and Singapore to go their separate ways. But this did not seem to end the chapter
of soccer corruption in the Southeast Asian region. For Singapore, even in its new
professional league, a small number of players have been charged with soccer corruption.
Even though only four players were convicted, it was seen as
a big problem, especially when Singapore had gone through the nightmare of winning the
double in 1994 and being wrecked with soccer corruption controversies the next. The
charging of these players meant that the problem of soccer corruption had not been weeded
out. Because of this, Singapore decided to launch its first soccer betting system this
year, in an attempt to weed out illegal soccer betting, which leads to bookies
bribing players. This system, called SCORE, was highlighted during the seminar. The
rest of the region will be watching to see if this system is successful here, before
deciding whether to implement it in their own countries. So far, SCORE has been
successful, for it has increased match attendance as people who are now able to bet
legally will want to come and watch the match as their moneys are at stake. With legalized
betting, there are no need for fans to bet on outcomes of matches through illegal bookies
who may have underworld connections. These bookies turn to players and either force or
persuade them to throw matches. So one can say that SCORE has been successful for match
attendance have gone up, revenues of clubs have increased and the interest in the league
matches have increased. But, although the good results are there, one cannot help feel a
tinge of sadness. There is a danger of unconsciously encouraging people to gamble, and in
turning Singapore into a nation of gamblers. But this had to be done in order to keep the
game clean. Soccer corruption can also be seen in other parts of the region. But I choose
to focus on Singapore as it is my country and thus the information is the most accurate.
I think one reason why players receive bribes is that they earn very little, unlike their
counterparts in the Middle East and Europe. Greed for money is one of human's weakness,
and thus this problem may not be easy to solve. But it is good to see the Asian Football
Confederation coming into the picture and actively trying to solve this problem. The
seminar is one step towards solving this problem, and I hope that the good name of
Southeast Asian soccer will not be again smeared by soccer corruption.
Other problems regarding Asian soccer include lack of effort by national
associations to improve welfare of their national teams, politicking among
officials, and also the mindsets of some Asian fans who feel that Western Soccer is always
better. I think one reason some fans do not support their local team is that they are
tired of the behavior of their national associations. Some associations do not
bother to provide the national team with proper training kits, and do not take the
initiative to organize training tours. They just sit there and expect the results
from their national players. National associations should realize that it takes two hands
to clap, and the associations cannot expect good results from the national team if the
officials do not provide the team with training kits, fields in proper conditions and
proper training schedules. Sacking coaches and replacing players may not solve the problem
of a team which is performing poorly. I am sure that every soccer fan wants to have a
national team they are proud of, and not one in which it is restricted by the
irresponsibility of the national soccer associations.
The problems listed above are some of the problems Asian
soccer faces. But I am not giving up on Asia yet. For me, I am proud that my country's
soccer league has managed to go into its fourth season successfully and I am hopeful that
with the league, my country's soccer will improve and be one of the best in Southeast
Asia. Also, I am proud to be a fan of Asian soccer, and I am not ashamed to say that my
favorite footballer is not a European but an Asian-- Iranian Mohammad Khakpour.
By Iran Kicks Reporter Elizabeth
Send your articles to
Irankicks |
|